Search for: All records

Reducing buildings’ carbon emissions is an important sustainability challenge. While scheduling flexible building loads has been previously used for a variety of grid and energy optimizations, carbon footprint reduction using such flexible loads poses new challenges since such methods need to balance both energy and carbon costs while also reducing user inconvenience from delaying such loads. This article highlights the potential conflict between electricity prices and carbon emissions and the resulting tradeoffs in carbon-aware and cost-aware load scheduling. To address this tradeoff, we propose GreenThrift, a home automation system that leverages the scheduling capabilities of smart appliances and knowledge of future carbon intensity and cost to reduce both the carbon emissions and costs of flexible energy loads. At the heart of GreenThrift is an optimization technique that automatically computes schedules based on user configurations and preferences. We evaluate the effectiveness of GreenThrift using real-world carbon intensity data, electricity prices, and load traces from multiple locations and across different scenarios and objectives. Our results show that GreenThrift can replicate the offline optimal and retains 97% of the savings when optimizing the carbon emissions. Moreover, we show how GreenThrift can balance the conflict between carbon and cost and retain 95.3% and 85.5% of the potential carbon and cost savings, respectively. 

Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) are Internet-scale systems that deliver streaming and web content to users from many geographically distributed edge data centers. Since large CDNs can comprise hundreds of thousands of servers deployed in thousands of global data centers, they can consume a large amount of energy for their operations and thus are responsible for large amounts of Green House Gas (GHG) emissions. As these networks scale to cope with increased demand for bandwidth-intensive content, their emissions are expected to rise further, making sustainable design and operation an important goal for the future. Since different geographic regions vary in the carbon intensity and cost of their electricity supply, in this paper, we consider spatial shifting as a key technique to jointly optimize the carbon emissions and energy costs of a CDN. We present two forms of shifting: spatial load shifting, which operates within the time scale of minutes, and VM capacity shifting, which operates at a coarse time scale of days or weeks. The proposed techniques jointly reduce carbon and electricity costs while considering the performance impact of increased request latency from such optimizations. Using real-world traces from a large CDN and carbon intensity and energy prices data from electric grids in different regions, we show that increasing the latency by 60ms can reduce carbon emissions by up to 35.5%, 78.6%, and 61.7% across the US, Europe, and worldwide, respectively. In addition, we show that capacity shifting can increase carbon savings by up to 61.2%. Finally, we analyze the benefits of spatial shifting and show that it increases carbon savings from added solar energy by 68% and 130% in the US and Europe, respectively. 

Cloud platforms’ rapid growth raises significant concerns about their electricity consumption and resulting carbon emissions. Power capping is a known technique for limiting the power consumption of data centers where workloads are hosted. Today’s data center computer clusters co-locate latency-sensitive web and throughput-oriented batch workloads. When power capping is necessary, throttling only the batch tasks without restricting latency-sensitive web workloads is ideal because guaranteeing low response time for latency-sensitive workloads is a must due to Service-Level Objectives (SLOs) requirements. This paper proposes PADS, a hardware-agnostic workload-aware power capping system. Due to not relying on any hardware mechanism such as RAPL and DVFS, it can keep the power consumption of clusters equipped with heterogeneous architectures such as x86 and ARM below the enforced power limit while minimizing the impact on latency-sensitive tasks. It uses an application-performance model of both latency-sensitive and batch workloads to ensure power safety with controllable performance. Our power capping technique uses diagonal scaling and relies on using the control group feature of the Linux kernel. Our results indicate that PADS is highly effective in reducing power while respecting the tail latency requirement of the latency-sensitive workload. Furthermore, compared to state-of-the-art solutions, PADS demonstrates lower P95 latency, accompanied by a 90% higher effectiveness in respecting power limits. 

Reducing tail latency has become a crucial issue for optimizing the performance of online cloud services and distributed applications. In distributed applications, there are many causes of high end-to-end tail latency, including operating system delays, request re-ordering due to fan-out/fanin, and network congestion. Although recent research has focused on reducing tail latency for individual application components, such as by replicating requests and scheduling, in this paper, we argue for a holistic approach for reducing the end-to-end tail latency across application components. We propose TailClipper, a distributed scheduler that tags each arriving request with an arrival timestamp, and propagates it across the microservices' call chain. TailClipper then uses arrival timestamps to implement an oldest request first scheduler that combines global first-come first serve with a limited form of processor sharing to reduce end-to-end tail latency. In doing so, TailClipper can counter the performance degradation caused by request reordering in multi-tiered and microservices-based applications. We implement TailClipper as a userspace Linux scheduler and evaluate it using cloud workload traces and a real-world microservices application. Compared to state-of-the-art schedulers, our experiments reveal that TailClipper improves the 99th percentile response time by up to 81%, while also improving the mean response time and the system throughput by up to 54% and 29% respectively under high loads. 

The rapid increase in computing demand and corresponding energy consumption have focused attention on computing's impact on the climate and sustainability. Prior work proposes metrics that quantify computing's carbon footprint across several lifecycle phases, including its supply chain, operation, and end-of-life. Industry uses these metrics to optimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing hardware and running computing applications. Unfortunately, prior work on optimizing datacenters' carbon footprint often succumbs to the sunk cost fallacy by considering embodied carbon emissions (a sunk cost) when making operational decisions (i.e., job scheduling and placement), which leads to operational decisions that do not always reduce the total carbon footprint. In this paper, we evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for several carbon accounting metrics. Our analysis reveals state-of-the-art carbon accounting metrics that include embodied carbon emissions when making operational decisions can increase the total carbon footprint of executing a set of jobs. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making. We then use a real-world case study from a datacenter to demonstrate how the sunk carbon fallacy manifests itself in practice. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in better guiding effective carbon-aware scheduling in on-premise and cloud datacenters.